A New York Times interview with Rep. Jake Auchincloss (D - Mass) by Bret Stephens caught my attention. I am somewhat familiar with Mr. Stephens from his various pieces in NYT; he is definitely a conservative, but in the old, pre-MAGA sense where it meant you worried about spending but you didn’t hate people who weren’t like you. Rep. Auchincloss, on the other hand, was unfamiliar to me, but the headline of the interview – The Democrat Who Makes Me Listen – proved apt.

Serving others first? What a novel concept. Credit: Microsoft Designer
For me,
the final line the interview summed everything up. Rep. Auchincloss is a Marine
veteran, having served in Afghanistan. Mr. Stephens asked: “Final question. If
there is one thing you learned in the Marine Corps which every American should
know, what is it?” Rep. Auchincloss’s reply was succinct, to the point, and
highly instructive: “Officers eat last.”
“Officers
eat last” – wow. That’s a philosophy I can buy into. That’s a credo I hope I
can live up to. That’s a slogan for a political movement I could get behind.
Of course,
I’m not just talking about literally only Marine officers, and I’m not just
talking about eating. I’m sure Rep. Auchincloss intended that it was a life
lesson that should be applied broadly. I.e., people in authority should make
sure the people they are responsible for get taken care of before they take
care of themselves. I don’t think that attitude is solely responsible for the esteemed
Marine esprit de corps, but it’s got to be part of it.
The trouble
is, we don’t see much of that attitude in the rest of America. When Congress
failed to pass a budget and millions of federal workers went without paychecks,
they (and their staffs) kept getting paid. When the White House went slashing
various budgets, it didn’t eliminate White House jobs.
If you want
to keep your blood pressure under control, don’t even ask how
generous the Congressional retirement package is. Suffice it to say that,
if you are one
of the few workers who still qualify for a defined benefit pension, it is
almost certainly less than theirs. Don’t get me started on how members of
Congress seem to get richer – a
lot richer – while in office, possibly due to insider
trading loopholes.
According to Gallup,
only 10% of Americans approve of the job Congress is doing, with 86%
disapproving, but they don’t care. They get paid anyway, and most House seats
aren’t competitive,
so most incumbents are in little danger of getting voted out.
It’s not
just politicians. All those billionaires – over 1,000 of them in the U.S.
alone! – didn’t get (or keep) all that money by putting anyone else first. CEOs
used to “only” make 15x
the average worker, but now make closer to 300x, with their pay going
up 20x the average worker’s pay increase in 2025 alone. If there was ever
an era of benevolent CEOs looking out for their workers, that era has long
gone. If CEOs can underpay or, better yet, layoff their workers, the better for
their compensation. The rich guys eat first, with the finest dining their
employees’ labor can finance.
It’s obscene.
It’s the opposite of officers eating last.
Rep. Auchincloss calls for “economic patriotism,” saying:
If the core idea of America is that the circumstances of your birth shouldn’t determine the condition of your life, you cannot have a durable “demos,” a durable sense of a shared American future, if you have an ossified American aristocracy. And that is what has happened. The top 10 percent of the American economy are people just increasingly divorcing themselves from the rest.
He wants,
in particular, for more wealth to be taxed at death, so the richest Americans
can’t keep passing along their wealth without ever paying taxes on the gains. He
recognizes that government overregulation can be an issue, but correctly points
out that the unbridled corporate monopolization we’ve seen in recent years is also
harmful. Gordon Gecko famously said “Greed is good, “ but Rep. Auchincloss counters
with “Officers eat last.”
I know
which side I’m on.
If the Democrats
had any sense, which they don’t, they’d seize upon this slogan and help define
how it applies to our everyday lives. They’d build out what “economic patriotism”
means. Dems are still getting blamed for NAFTA and letting China join the World
Trade Organization, with the subsequent loss of many U.S. jobs, but those jobs
didn’t just magically disappear. Rich people decided they could get richer by offshoring
them, and if that meant losses of lots of jobs and devastation of many communities,
so be it. The Dems should never have taken the blame, and, instead, should have
aggressively pointed the finger at the true culprits.
To be
honest, I don’t think the Democrats are the right party to advocate this idea.
They have their own cadres of rich people, both in office and among their
donors, and it shows in their policies. The Democratic brand is so toxic that
they may be beyond reinvention. That’s why, say, Rob
Sand in Iowa’s Governor’s race or Graham
Platner in Maine’s U.S. Senate race are carefully trying to not talk about
their ties to the party, and Dan
Osborn in the Nebraska U.S. Senate race is running as an independent (with
the tacit support of the state’s Democratic Party).
Those are
the kinds of politicians who could make the “officers eat last” pitch and make
it work. Chuck Schumer? Kamala Harris? Gavin
Newsom? I don't think so.
Neither party
has a real vision for how – or agreement on even whether – to address the growing
inequality in America, much less a vision for how to address AI and other revolutionary
technological changes that are upon us. We should have long ago grappled with climate
change and microplastics, but there was too much money in the status quo.
It’s not the
answer, but “officers eat last” could be part of an answer. Show me the
candidates who believe in, live by, and will fight for it, and they’d have my
vote.


No comments:
Post a Comment