I
understand that states are “racing”
to pass laws designed to help protect school-aged kids against something that
has been a danger to their mental and physical health for a generation now, as
well as adversely impacting their education. Certainly I’m talking about
reasonable gun control laws, right?
Should this be banned? Credit: Bing Image Creator |
Just kidding. This is America. We don’t do gun control laws, no matter how many innocent school children, or other bystanders, are massacred. No, what states are taking action on are cellphones in schools.
Florida
seems to have kicked it off, with a new
last year banning cell phones and other wireless devices “during instructional
times.” It also prohibiting using TikTok on school grounds. Indiana,
Louisiana,
Ohio,
and South
Carolina followed suit this year, although the new laws vary in specifics. Connecticut, Kansas, Oklahoma, Washington, and
Vermont have
introduced their own versions. Delaware
and Pennsylvania are giving money to schools to try lockable phone pouches.
It’s worth
pointing out that school districts were not waiting around for states to act.
According to a Pew
Research survey earlier this year, 82%
of teachers reported their district had policies regarding cellphones in
classrooms. Those policies might not have been bans, but at least the districts
were making efforts to control the use.
Surprisingly,
high school teachers – whose students were most likely to have cellphones --
were least likely to report such policies, but, not surprisingly, the most
likely to report that such policies were difficult to enforce. Also not surprising, 72% of high school
teachers say students being distracted by cellphones in the classroom is a
major problem.
I believe that future generations will look back with the same incredulity at our acceptance of phones in schools. The research is clear: The dramatic rise in adolescent anxiety, depression, and suicide correlates closely with the widespread adoption of smartphones over the past 15 years. Although causation is debated, as a school head for 14 years, I know what I have seen: Unfettered phone usage at school hurts our kids.
Similarly,
last year Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist
at NYU, urged emphatically: Get
Phones Out of School Now. At the least, he writes, they’re a
distraction, harming their learning and their ability to focus; at worst, they weaken
social connections, are used for bullying, and can lead to mental health
issues. “All children deserve schools that will help them learn, cultivate deep
friendships, and develop into mentally healthy young adults,” Professor Haidt
believes. “All children deserve phone-free schools.”
Mr. Shaw
agrees. “For too long, children all over the world have been guinea pigs in a
dangerous experiment. The results are in. We need to take phones out of schools.”
Believe it
or not, not everyone agrees. Some argue that, like it or not, our world is
filled with cellphones, and to try to pretend that is not true will just make
it harder for kids once they become adults. Along those lines, skeptics note
that classrooms are filled with other devices; if kids aren’t distracted by their
cellphones, there’s usually a tablet, laptop, or other device handy. And the
kids can argue, hey, the adults – the teachers, the administrators, the volunteers
– all have cellphones; why shouldn’t we?
Some parents
are opposed to the bans. They want to know where their kids are at all times,
and to be able to track them in case of an emergency. Even more chilling, some
parents argue that if there is a school shooting, they want their kids to be
able to call for help, and to let them know their status. None of us can forget
the heartbreaking
calls that some of the Uvalde children made.
Of course,
even if cellphones are banned during class time or even on school grounds
entirely, those phones are going to be there once they leave the school
grounds, so their potential for adverse mental impacts will still be there. If
distraction is the problem – and I can see where it would be – isn’t it a
similar problem for adults? How many
meetings, conferences, or social situations have you been in where many of the
adults are paying more attention to their phone than to whatever is being
discussed?
I wonder
if the Supreme Court has a policy about cellphones during its deliberations.
All this
brings me back to guns. According to the K-12 Shooting Database, there have
already been 193 school shooting incidents already this year, with 152 victims
(fatal and wounded). That compares to 349 and 249 respectively in 2023, and 308/273
in 2022. I needn’t point out – but I will – that no other nation has numbers
anywhere close to those.
I recently
read John Woodrow Cox’s searing Children
Under Fire. He points out that, even beyond the fatalities, wounded
kids need not just medical care but ongoing mental health treatment. Their
families usually need it too. The trauma goes well beyond the direct victims. The
victim’s classmates and families often need it as well, as do schoolchildren in
other districts, even in other states. Even practicing lockdowns have an impact
on mental health.
He
estimates that there are millions, perhaps tens of millions, of impacted schoolchildren
and their families. Yet states aren’t racing to ensure support for all those
victims.
Mr. Cox
suggests that the least we could do, the very least, are to ensure more
background checks, to hold adults more responsible for the guns in their homes,
and to conduct more research on gun violence. Instead, states are rushing to “harden”
schools and to get more
people with guns guarding (and teaching in) those schools.
Oh, and to
ban cellphones. We must have priorities, after all.
Look, if I
was a teacher, I’d hate seeing kids on their phones during class. If I was
administrator, I’d be worried about kids hanging out on their phones instead of
talking with each other. If I was a parent I’d be nagging my kids to study or read
a book instead of being on a screen. I get all that; I understand the drive to better
manage cellphone use.
No comments:
Post a Comment