The healthcare world is abuzz with Dr. David Feinberg’s departure from Google Health – another tech giant is shocked to find healthcare was so complicated! – while one of those tech giants (Amazon) not only just surpassed Walmart in consumer spending but also is now planning to build its own department stores. Both very interesting, but all I can think about is robots.
Most of the recent publicity about robots has come
from Elon Musk’s announcement
of the Tesla Bot, or the new
video of Boston Dynamic’s Atlas doing more amazing acrobatics, but I was
more intrigued by Brooks Barnes’s New York Times article Are
You Ready for Sentient Disney Robots?
Like many industries that serve consumers, healthcare
has long been envious of Disney’s success with customer experience. Disney even offers the Disney Institute to train others in
their expertise with it. Disney claims
its advantage is: “Where others
let things happen, we're consistently intentional in our actions.” That means focusing on “the details that
other organizations may often undermanage—or ignore.”
You’d have to admit
that healthcare ignores too many of the details, allowing things to happen that
shouldn’t.
1964 audio-animatronics. Credit: Walt Disney |
Mr. Barnes quotes Josh
D’Amaro, chairman of Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, from an April
presentation: “We think a lot about relevancy.
We have an obligation to our fans, to our guests, to continue to evolve,
to continue to create experiences that look new and different and pull them in.
To make sure the experience is fresh and relevant.”
Enter Project
Kiwi.
In April, Scott LaValley,
the lead engineer on the project, told
TechCrunch’s Matthew Panzarino: “Project KIWI started about three years ago to figure out how we can
bring our smaller characters to life at their actual scale in authentic ways.” The prototype is Marvel’s character
Groot, featured in comic books and the Guardians of the Galaxy
movies (he is famous for only saying “I am Groot,” although apparently
different intonations result in an entire language).
By 2021, they had a
functioning prototype:
Mr. Barnes reported
that his interactions with the would-be Groot were quite remarkable. It spoke to him, reacted to his initial non-response,
and, eventually, “I wanted to
hug him. And take him home.” Mr. Panzarino
was similar impressed: “Multiple
times throughout my interaction I completely forgot that it was a robot at all.”
That’s the goal.
“And all of this technology
must disappear, which takes a crazy amount of engineering,” Leslie Evans, Disney’s
Senior Imagineer, told Mr. Barnes. “We don’t want anyone thinking, ‘That’s the
most sophisticated robot I have ever encountered.’ It has to be: ‘Look! It’s
Groot!”
According
to CNBC, “Project Kiwi is heading for the “play test” stage, where
the Imagineers bring the character into the park to interact with guests and
gather feedback. The company has not shared when this will take place or at
which park.”
Groot is only the beginning. Mr. Barnes said:
He is a prototype for a small-scale, free-roaming robotic actor that can take on the role of any similarly sized Disney character. In other words, Disney does not want a one-off. It wants a technology platform for a new class of animatronics.
CNBC also
reported on Disney’s Project Exo, which is similarly creating a “full body
exoskeleton system” as a platform to bring to life larger characters (think the
Incredible Hulk).
The Disney world is already
speculating on whether the goal is to replace human workers in the parks (walking
around in the heat in those Disney character costumes is no picnic), but Mr.
Barnes believes it is more about Disney needing to change traditionally passive
experiences into more interactive ones. Ms.
Evans told him: “These aren’t just
parks. They are inhabited places.”
If, as
Elon Musk believes, “the economy is, at the foundation, labor,” then there
may be no sector in which this is more true than in healthcare (especially
long term care). Tech companies may
be failing in healthcare because they think adding a tech layer will “fix”
things, but our current system isn’t going anywhere until we address labor – its
costs, its supply limitations, its productivity output. The pandemic
almost
broke our healthcare workers last year, and the recent surge is
overwhelming them again.
Healthcare could use more robots.
Hanson Robotics' Grace. Credit: CNN |
It’s not there yet; it would need
considerable evolution to play a significant role in our healthcare system, but,
with the right investments, it will get there.
And, yes, eventually there will be robot doctors, powered by AI.
Mr. Panzarino brings up the field of human-robot interaction (HRI),
and asserts that, of all the companies, industries, and academic centers working
on it, “the most incredibly
interesting work in this space is being done in Imagineering R&D.” Again, as the Disney Institute preaches, focusing
“on the details that other organizations may often undermanage – or ignore.”
I wish healthcare was leading HRI.
Healthcare needs to change its customer experience
from passive to interactive. If Disney
recognizes the need to stay “fresh and relevant,” that is all-the-moreso in
healthcare. Healthcare thinks it is in
the care business, but it must also recognize it is in the experience business –
and that its experience currently is pretty woeful (often literally). It’s undermanaging and often ignoring the details
that make up that experience. And when
does technology in healthcare ever “disappear”?
Robots alone aren’t going to change all that in
healthcare, but the level of attention – to detail, to relevancy, to customer
experience -- that Disney brings to its robotics efforts could go a long
way.
No comments:
Post a Comment