People are fascinated by blood. Well, it would seem so, given our fondness for vampires, gory movies, and true crime stories. I’m not so keen on any of those, but I was struck by several recent developments about how blood tests can help diagnose medical problems faster, more definitively, and less invasively.
C'mon, it's not that bad. Credit: Bing Image Creator
Because,
really, shouldn’t that be what our healthcare system always should strive for?
Take concussions.
If you are a football fan, you’re very familiar with the problem that it seems
very subjective about whether a player has suffered a concussion. They’re not
the only ones. Millions of people suffer concussions each year – the vast
majority of whom are not athletes – and more
than half never get it evaluated.
In April
Abbott received
FDA approval for a rapid blood test, producing results in 15 minutes. It
can be done at a patient’s beside, and not require a lab. "Clinicians have
needed an objective way to assess patients with concussions," said Beth
McQuiston, M.D., medical director in Abbott's diagnostics business. "When
you look at all the other diseases, or other organs in the body, they all have
blood tests to help assess what's happening. Now, we have a whole blood test
that can help assess the brain right at the patient's bedside – expanding
access to more health providers and therefore patients."
Expect to
see the Abbott's i-STAT TBI cartridge and portable i-STAT® Alinity®
instrument in emergency rooms, not to mention on NFL sidelines.
Credit: Abbott |
Specifically,
it measures “the ratio of plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) relative to
non–p-tau217 (expressed as percentage of p-tau217) combined with the amyloid-β
42 and amyloid-β 40 plasma ratio (the amyloid probability score 2 [APS2]).” Got
that?
“We’d love
to have a blood test that can be used in a primary
care physician’s office, functioning like a cholesterol test but for
Alzheimer’s,” Dr. Maria Carrillo, chief science officer of the Alzheimer’s
Association, told
CNN. “The p-tau217 blood test is turning out to be the most specific
for Alzheimer’s and the one with the most validity. It seems to be the
front-runner.”
It’s not
quite ready for use in your doctor’s office, though. “Right now, we don’t have
guidelines for the use of these tests,” Dr. Eliezer Masliah, director of the
division of neuroscience at the National Institute on Aging, warned
NPR. Dr. Suzanne Schindler, an associate professor of neurology at
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, added: “Blood tests have
developed incredibly fast for Alzheimer disease and I think [doctors] aren’t
used to that rate of change.”
“The field
is moving at a pace I never imagined 10 years ago,” Dr. Heather
Whitson, a professor of medicine at Duke University, marveled
to NPR.
We’re
increasingly seeing FDA approved drug treatments for Alzheimer’s, so it’d be
nice if we had FDA approved blood tests to more accurately use them.
Last but
not least, there’s colorectal cancer (CRC). The FDA recently
approved Guardant Health’s Shield™ blood test for colorectal cancer screening,
and is the first such blood test approved by the FDA as a primary screening
option. A Guardant study found that it
identified 87% of cancers that were at an early and curable stage, although it
does less well at finding precancerous growths. The test is aimed at adults 45
and older who are at average risk.
Credit: Guardant Health |
“The
persistent gap in colorectal cancer screening rates shows that the existing
screening options do not appeal to millions of people,” said
Daniel Chung, MD, gastroenterologist at Massachusetts General Hospital and
Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School. “The FDA's approval of the
Shield blood test marks a tremendous leap forward, offering a compelling new
solution to close this gap.”
Dr. Sapna
Syngal, director of strategic planning for prevention and early cancer
detection at the Dana-Farber Cancer Center in Boston agrees, telling
NBC News: “If this test increases the number of people getting
screened, it’s going to have a huge impact.”
The test
is on the market now, and Guardant expects approval for coverage by Medicare
and commercial insurance.
Most of us
are used to getting routine blood tests for things like blood counts or cholesterol
levels, so it’s exciting that blood tests are started to be used for other important
health issues.
--------------
Blood
tests are all well and good, but they’re not (yet) the kind of test you’d routinely
expect to use at home on your own. ARPA-H has even bigger aspirations. It just
announced the Platform Optimizing SynBio for Early Intervention and
Detection in Oncology (POSEIDON) program, the goal of which is “to develop
first-in-class, at-home, synthetic Multi-Cancer-Early Detection (MCED) tests
for the most sensitive and specific stage I detection of 30+ solid tumors*
using only breath and/or urine samples.”
No blood
draw or lab tech needed, just breath or urine samples done yourself at home. That’s
something to shoot for.
“Access to
a low-cost cancer screening test that does not need a lab test is so critical
to preventing late-stage diagnoses, increasing survival rates, and reducing
high treatment costs,” said ARPA-H Director Renee Wegrzyn, Ph.D. “With
POSEIDON, we could put the power of cancer screening into homes in the U.S. and
around the world.”
“But what
if any adult could, at their discretion, take an at-home test that could detect
Stage I cancer? POSEIDON aims to create a future in which any adult can take a
simple, over-the-counter test to screen for and detect 30+ cancers at Stage I,
when they are still localized, to drastically improve the chances of curative
treatment and survival,” said Ross Uhrich, DMD, MBA,
ARPA-H POSEIDON’s Program Manager.
“But what
if…” indeed. ARPA-H is thinking big --
as it should. And as should we all.
No comments:
Post a Comment