If you’re
anything like me, you’ve noticed that food costs have been increasing. Whether
it is food from the grocery or at a restaurant, the bill can be eye-opening
compared to a few years ago. Blame the pandemic, blame corporate greed, blame
the President – take your pick. But the bottom line is, you have to eat. You
can buy lower priced options, you can go out less often, you can skimp on
non-food spending, but you’re going to buy food. The other thing you can do is
to complain.
Health care bills do that to you. Credit: Bing Image Creator
Well, the
fast food industry, for one, is listening to those complaints, and many leading
fast food companies have launched a variety of “value meals” to reduce the pain
consumers feel. Evidently they are still capable of feeling shame, or at least
of recognizing that consumers have choices.
I just
wish the healthcare industry was capable of doing the same.
Let’s be
clear: the fast food industry has brought this on themselves. The Wall Street
Journal reports
that prices of food eaten away from home rose 30% since 2019, according to
labor Department statistics, and that prices for a Big Mac increased 21% over
the same period. McNugget meals were up 28% over the same period.
It didn’t take long for other fast food chains to offer their
own version. KFC introduced its $4.99 value menu back in April, even before
McDonald’s announcement. Wendy’s has a $3 breakfast deal, Burger King has a $5
Your Way Meal, Taco Bell has something it calls a Luxe Craving Box for $7, Starbucks
has a new Pairing Menu priced between $5-$7, Jack in the Box has a $4 munchies
Meal, and Sonic now offers a $1.99 menu it calls “Fun.99,” which it says will be
permanent, not a time limited promotion. I’m sure there are others.
“It still holds true that imitation is the sincerest form of
flattery,” Burger King North American president Tom Curtis said in a May email to restaurant operators.
“We know the competition is doing that. So we will be in that game,” Jack in
the Box Chief Executive Darin Harris said.
Lest
anyone be worried about hurting the fast food companies’ margins, R.J. Hottovy,
head of analytical research at Placer.ai, told
Yahoo Finance: “It really comes down to … repeat visits after the fact. You're
not making money on the value menu. You're making menu money on the other
products, the more premium products, the dessert products, the beverage
products that go along with that.”
Health
care is like food in that almost anywhere you go you can probably find it. There
are fast food restaurants seemingly on every corner, but there also are drugstores
and doctors’ offices somewhere near those fast food restaurants. Health care
may not quite be omnipresent, but it’s pretty present.
Unlike
food, you may not need health care every day -- but you are going to need it at
some point. It may be a simple visit, it may be a pill a day for a few days,
but it could be a mind-boggling array of tests, medications and procedures you
never imagined or lifelong care.
In a fast
food restaurant, you look at the menu, pick what you want and how much you are
willing to pay, but with health care you don’t have such a menu. Someone else
is usually telling what you need and dictating how much you’ll pay for it. After
numerous “price transparency” efforts in these last few years, you might be
able to find some set of prices, but if anyone has ever successfully been able
to use them for anything other than the simplest of interactions, I’d like to
know about it.
Fast food
is extremely competitive, and you’d think that health care, with all of our options,
would be a fiercely competitive market as well. Most health care organizations
would tell you that it is. But most healthcare markets have become highly
concentrated. Those consolidations lead to higher
prices, and those higher prices lead to lost
jobs and lower wages in the local economy. “The
harm from these mergers really falls squarely on Main Street,” said Zack Cooper, an associate professor of economics at Yale
University.Credit: KFF
Professor
Cooper added:
“That’s one of the, I think,
incredibly subtle but sinister consequences of rising health spending. It leads
individuals to lose their job.”
Consumers have been complaining about health care prices for
as long as I’ve been involved in healthcare, which is longer than I care to
admit (hint: I remember when health care spending was under 10% of GDP). What I
don’t remember is health care organizations ever lowering prices, even temporarily.
Look at insulin. It’s absolutely critical for those who need
it. It was invented decades ago, and should have been cheap long ago. But it
took a federal law to limit what consumers had to pay for it – against the drug
companies’ vigorous lobbying efforts. And, of course, the only thing that was actually
reduced was how much consumers paid out-of-pocket – not the total price.
The same law that enacted the limit on insulin out-of-pocket
costs also allowed
Medicare to negotiate some prescription drug prices, again against the continued
opposite from pharmaceutical companies. The only way, it seems, to get
healthcare organizations to lower prices is to legislate it (and if you think
those healthcare organizations are going to suffer from such negotiations, look
at pharmaceutical stocks).
Maybe I shouldn’t wish for healthcare organizations to try to
lure in more customers through “value” pricing offers (especially knowing they’d
just try to make it up on other services). Maybe health care is truly too
complex for such simple solutions. Maybe the fast food industry is never a good
model for health care.
But I sure wouldn’t mind if I saw more evidence that health
care organizations felt consumers’ pain from high health care costs, and sought
to do their part to reduce it.
No comments:
Post a Comment