tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-958880090596233405.post7791207132694135818..comments2023-12-26T11:12:19.407-05:00Comments on From a Different Perspective...: Guess What: Docs Don't Like EHRsKim Bellardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15491479485371241260noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-958880090596233405.post-65699145358052518322016-07-09T10:08:57.228-04:002016-07-09T10:08:57.228-04:00Tim -- I couldn't agree more, and I know you a...Tim -- I couldn't agree more, and I know you and others are trying to move the market there. Keep at it!Kim Bellardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15491479485371241260noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-958880090596233405.post-8719426153883678962016-07-09T08:33:18.881-04:002016-07-09T08:33:18.881-04:00Kim, the biggest flaw in the current system is the...Kim, the biggest flaw in the current system is the thought that the data should reside within the "EHR" program in the first place. It's easy to see how this came about in the "digitization" of paper records. But to really move the bar on health delivery, a patient's health record is something that should follow the patient in ALL their interface with the HC system, as something the patient has personally, or delegates to a third-party "data custodian". "EHR", as a program, would then be only the front-end to this longitudinal patient record. Interoperability need only be with this record, not with other EHR programs data stores. Getting EHRs in the current system to interoperate on data is tantamount to "herding cats". It's not going to happen. TShearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03623013204856421340noreply@blogger.com